Showing posts with label advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label advertising. Show all posts

10 March 2007

Heineken Skypecasts Concert

Heineken is known for its innovative approach to marketing and like many brands it's active in the area of music. That activity includes sponsorship of music events and venues and it's always looking for new ways to get in touch with its target audience.

In recent years, it's worked closely with Qi-ideas to develop online innovation to help break through the clutter.
Last September, it took that approach to a new level.


Internet telephony brand Skype introduced Skypecasting in August 2006, a new feature that allows up to 100 consumers to be in direct contact at any one time. Heineken on Sept. 8 became the first to host a live concert broadcast via Skype throughout the world. Dutch band Johan broadcast an exclusive acoustic gig to an audience who had won their right to participate via a contest on Heineken's website.

The great advantage of the Skypecast is that unlike a webcast, it's possible to have a two-way interaction with listeners asking questions and applauding.
While the gig only lasted a short while, the activity also created video content for the brand that could be viewed online for months after the actual event.

Heineken generated a host of free public relations placements from the global media first as well as garnering early learning about a new medium that could become an important channel in the future.

02 March 2007

Requiem pour NIKE

The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat are physically felt in a 60'' spot for Brand Jordan.
Set to Mozart's Requiem, the ad promotes the Air Jordan XX2 shoe

An other jewel from Wieden&Kennedy NY

06 February 2007

Super Bowl Ad Watch : Top spots

Les slots les plus chers du monde pour les meilleurs spots ?

Have a look !

31 January 2007

A More-Targeted World Isn't Necessarily a More Civilized One

Our Alarming Momentum Toward a Narrowing of the Collective Mind

Better, narrower targeting in the marketing world is taken as an absolute good, if not the holy grail. And certainly it behooves marketers to seek audiences open to their messages, and to tailor messages to heavy users of their products.

I heard a media expert say this on a panel a while back: "If I'm a dog-food maker I am now able to send my commercial messages only to dog owners."
I guess that spells good news for the makers of dog food and addressable media technology. But the statement also sends a little shiver up my spine as it hints at an increasingly alarming media and cultural trend -- the narrowing of the collective mind.

In the wider media world, it's also taken as an unalloyed good that we can receive only the messages we've already decided we want to see.
In the mainstream media, it's the Fox News effect -- with more media outlets trying to emulate that ideologically single-minded approach and screeching to an ever more credulous choir.

The web, while granting us access to a previously unimaginably wide world of information and content, has paradoxically also encouraged us to create an opinion cocoon. We don't need to read what some blowhard editor thinks are important stories; we can assemble our own news channel. We can find a small online community that can justify our taste in anything.

This isn't so much a lament for the collective consciousness and memory that mass TV provided during my life up to now. Nor is it primarily a defense of the pleasurable and intellectually fortifying practice of reading and considering things way outside of your area of interest, intentionally or by accident.

What seem to bear examination are the issues that attend the flip side of the customization/consumer-control coin -- that the contraction of our worldview makes us less likely or less able to engage in real debate, to evaluate foreign ideas, to get dirty. As Guy Barnett, founder of New York agency the Brooklyn Brothers, puts it in the agency's blog : "No one changes their mind anymore." "If everyone agrees with you," Barnett notes, "where's the fun?"

When I read about this group or that individual seeking to ban what they deem offensive (an insurance company can't depict K-Fed as a restaurant worker because it demeans restaurant workers; the Chinese can't depict pigs in ads as pigs run afoul of a segment of the population), first I laugh. Then I get concerned that this will become the way of things. Maybe one day you won't be able to say anything to anyone because a common language or the ability to grapple with or laugh at something outside of your comfort zone will have fallen away.

The famous Heinlein quote that tells us "specialization is for insects" also tells us that "a human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly."

To that list perhaps we should add: "Watch a dog-food commercial even if she doesn't currently have a dog."

Source: AdAge

24 January 2007

A Tokyo, les magasins parlent aux passants par puces interposées

Je suis en retard de 72h sur l'info, mais bon c'est toujours de l'info !


Ginza, le quartier le plus chic de Tokyo, tente une première mondiale. A partir du dimanche 21 janvier, les passants de cette zone commerçante vont être immergés dans un large réseau de communication radio. A tout moment, par l'intermédiaire d'un appareil ad hoc, ils pourront recevoir des informations cibléesen fonction de leur localisation : publicité pour un magasin situé à quelques mètres, offre promotionnelle à saisir... Ils pourront également demander l'itinéraire pour aller à la parfumerie ou à la station de métro la plus proche, le tout en quatre langues.
Pour participer à cette expérience, l'utilisateur va devoir s'équiper d'un Ubiquitous Communicator, un appareil portable d'une dizaine de centimètres de long, gratuit jusqu'au 10 mars et capable de lire toutes les données émises par le réseau installé dans les rues. Car pour réussir l'expérience, les deux grandes avenues de Ginza ainsi que les couloirs du métro souterrain ont été truffés de près de 10 000 "marqueurs", des relais d'informations. Il s'agit soit de puces RFID (Radiofrequency Identification), soit de codes optiques ou encore de marqueurs à infrarouge. Ces relais discrets ont été installés sur du mobilier urbain. Les propriétaires de téléphone portable auront également la possibilité de profiter partiellement de l'expérience, mais ils auront accès à un nombre limité d'informations.

Baptisée Tokyo Ubiquitous Project Ginza, cette expérimentation soutenue par le ministère du territoire, de l'équipement et des transports, s'inscrit dans un projet plus vaste, dans l'optique d'installer ce type de réseau dans des villes entières, et pourquoi pas dans tout le pays. "Le réseau mis en place à Ginza va nous permettre d'évaluer les problèmes restant à résoudre, d'affiner les technologies, prévoit Ken Sakamura, chercheur à l'université de Tokyo et directeur de T-engine, la structure qui coordonne le projet. Le réseau restera en place jusqu'à la généralisation de ce type de structure dans la société japonaise, ce qui devrait arriver autour de 2017."

D'ici là de nouvelles questions vont se poser. "Au-delà des aspects techniques, il faudra résoudre des problèmes législatifs, souligne M. Sakamura. Nous avons besoin d'un cadre juridique car l'installation de ces systèmes pose des problèmes de sécurité, mais aussi de protection des données personnelles."


(Source: Le Monde.fr)

21 December 2006

2007 Web Predictions

Après le post du 12 décembre dernier sur le bilan des "Web technology trends of 2006", la même équipe donne ses prévisions sur ce que seront les highlights de 2007

Ca fourmille de repères, mais je vous épargne l'interminable ascenseur via le lien ci-joint...


(ReadWrite/Web)

16 December 2006

Personalised adverts on mobile TV


Mobile TV viewers in Norway will be served personalised adverts as part of a two-month trial.

Banner adverts will be sent to mobile phones and tailored to the individual user under the trial by broadcaster NRK, a mobile TV pioneer.

"Advertisers see value in people being interested in certain products in a given context," said Gunnar Garfors, director of development at NRK.

Two TV channels and four radio stations are taking part in the trial.
"Most people who watch mobile TV in Norway do so because
they are bored somewhere, on transport, or waiting," said Mr Garfors.
"You can assume they are near a shop or service which may be relevant."

The TV and radio stations are streamed to the phones over a 3G phone network and are "near-live with a few seconds' delay.
Mobile TV is a growing market that is yet to hit the mainstream partly because of cost and partly because of competing mobile TV standards.

Unlike other "live TV services" on the market, the NRK trial is streaming video rather than broadcasting it.

According to research firm eMarketer there are 44.5 million 3G subscribers worldwide who watch mobile TV on their phone. Their report predicts the number will double each year, reaching 520.9 million by 2009.

The number of subscribers who pay for premium video services and watch them on their phone will go from six million worldwide to 121.5 million by 2009, it predicts.
Adverts from 20 different companies are targeted to the viewers, depending on the information given to NRK when they signed up for the trial.

Mr Garfors said: "We know lots about the viewers; we have their phone numbers, their name, sex and where they live.
"We can also determine their presumed interests when we see what they watch or listen to and what times they do it.
And we know where they are geographically because of positioning technology.
"When we put this all together we have a fair amount of relevant information which can give them more relevant advertising material."

While the trial is a "proof of concept", Mr Garfors said future developments could see adverts sent to phones dependent on the precise location of the viewer.

Target demographic

For example, companies could have adverts sent to viewers matching their target demographic who happen to be waiting for a bus close to shops where their products are on sale.

People taking part in the trial download a small computer program - a Java application - onto their phones.
The application is also used to change channels on the phone as well as to give viewers the chance to vote interactively during programmes, and send audio and video messages.

"You can also watch or listen to on demand programmes."
Norway is pioneering mobile TV and radio, said Mr Garfors.
"It's beyond the early adopters. Most phones are 3G and they all have built in video players. It's quite popular."

Cost continues to be a barrier for many people, however, as mobile operators charge customers for the data - in this case video or audio - that is downloaded on to their phones.
Mr Garfors said: "One of the problems is that the operators have different price systems. It's still assumed to be quite expensive."

But the introduction of flat rate subscription services - for about £3 a month - could open the floodgates to more viewers.

Mr Garfors said NRK was pioneering mobile TV because of changing viewing habits among the younger generation.
He said: "We are losing out on younger viewers and listeners when it comes to traditional TV and radio.
"On the mobile platform they are big users. If we are just going to continue to do traditional TV and radio, who knows who long we will be in business?"

(BBCNews)

Dove Latest to Solicit Ads From Consumers

Unilever's Dove is joining the growing ranks of brands enlisting consumers to do the work their ad agencies once did. It's asking "real women" to create TV ads to run during the Academy Awards on ABC Feb. 25.

In an e-mail today to members of its online relationship-marketing program, Dove began seeking entries for a 30-second ad to promote a new product, Dove Cream Oil Body Wash.

The e-mail directs people to DoveCreamOil.com, a site hosted on Time Warner's AOL, which provides online tools, artwork, photos and music for creating ads, and also allows consumers to upload their own files. "You don't need any special skills or experience," the e-mail says.

Actress Sara Ramirez is also touting the program on tonight's "Access Hollywood."

Three finalists will win trips to a private Academy Awards viewing party in Los Angeles, and the winning spot will run during the Academy Awards broadcast. The contest is open only to women and, of course, only to amateurs.

WPP Group's Ogilvy & Mather, Chicago, handles creative for the brand, and MindShare, New York, handles media. Independent Edelman Worldwide, New York, handles public relations.

(AdAge)

15 December 2006

CAA Recruiters Target Madison Avenue


LOS ANGELES -
In a trend that underscores the degree to which entertainment and advertising continue to converge, the Creative Artists Agency has plucked some of its latest big hires not from Hollywood but from agencies like Wieden & Kennedy, JWT and Publicis.

(Madison&Vine)

12 December 2006

Media Spending in '07? Don't Expect Big Boost

Want one forecast rather than five forecasts? Media spending next year will be depressingly flat.

If you don't like that Ad Age conclusion -- which is based on a thorough analysis of the history of media spending and our read on the many factors affecting media right now -- you can go with one of the many marginally more optimistic forecasts proferred last week.

Good guesses
Group M went with 2.4% overall growth; eMarketer went for 3%; ZenithOptimedia 4.1%; and Universal McCann 4.8%. There are also Merrill Lynch's forecasts: 2.6% when calculated bottoms-up by industry and 2.7% when calculated top-down by media.

Take the average of those predictions, for what they're worth, and you have media rising 3.6% next year, just above the rate of inflation. But the media market has arguably never been in greater flux than it is today, meaning that there are some huge unknowns lurking in the shadows.

Not least is the fact that marketers are spending more of their money on nonmedia marketing tools (direct, events, point-of-sale) than ever before and embracing the theory that they need to create great content and brand experiences that consumers will seek out rather than spending big to "push" their messages at consumers. Procter & Gamble's corporate site, for example, draws more eyeballs than many of the prime-time TV shows where the company advertises. And Anheuser-Busch is building a 24-hour web network called Bud.tv.

Potential surprises
As to those potential surprises around the corner, just think about '06. Who would have predicted Google would pay $1.65 billion for YouTube, while a pair of teen magazines -- with combined paid circulation over 2 million -- got shut down?

It's hard for ad-spend forecasts to incorporate the fallout from developments like those. So smart directional guidance, with an allowance for the chance of "flat," is the best top line that the industry has. Deeper down, the differences among reports at least highlight the uncertainty, while some specific disagreements pinpoint areas really worth watching. Here's the partial tour.

Ads on paper
Newspapers may be hugely profitable, but even including their online classifieds, the top-down prognosis from Merrill Lynch predicts their ad revenue will fall 1.5% next year. The Morton-Groves Newspaper Newsletter anticipates a 0.6% decline when online is included and a 2% decline when it's not. The bulls include McCann, which expects a 1.8% rise, and Zenith, looking for a 2% gain.

Publishers are striving to prove the bulls right. Everyone is pushing digital, finding costs to cut and developing hyper-local coverage. "We are neither myopic nor ignorant," said Gary Pruitt, chairman-CEO of McClatchy Co., speaking to analysts at the Credit Suisse media conference last week. "Once again newspapers face an evolutionary imperative: Adapt or die."

Consumer magazines have a better outlook. McCann predicts at a 5% gain and Zenith estimates 5.3%. Merrill sees consumer magazines expanding revenue by 2.5%.

Ads on screens
Someday it will be hard, or pointless, to separate screen-based media into categories such as TV and the internet, much less network TV and cable, but for now the differences remain real and important. "In 2007," Zenith writes, "as more online opportunities draw ad dollars from traditional media and sports coverage continues to migrate to cable networks, broadcast TV will stagnate."

In this case "stagnate" means "fall 1.5%." Merrill more or less agrees, forecasting a 1.2% decline for the networks. Again McCann provides the mirror a lot of media sellers will prefer, calculating 3% increases for ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox. But everyone expects cable to rise, Merrill by 5.8%, Zenith by 6% and McCann by 6.5%.

Ads online
Although the web's ad-revenue growth is slowing, the pace in 2007 will still blow everything else away. The big question is how much. On the low end, McCann predicts 15% growth; on the high end, Zenith sees 29% coming.

The figure is just 18.9% at eMarketer, but its forecast differs from the others to say web ads will match radio next year and pass it in 2008. "It's one thing for internet ad spending to surpass relatively minor media such as outdoor or yellow pages, but it's quite another thing to blow past radio, one of the big four traditional media," said David Hallerman, senior analyst.

If you're wondering what TNS Media Intelligence has to say, by the way, that outfit might play its predictions the safest of all: It won't make a 2007 forecast until January.

(AdAge.com)

Times Sq. Ads Spread Via Tourists’ Cameras

Advertisers have long been drawn to Times Square as a valuable place to reach consumers, paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for space on billboards and blazing video screens.

But recently they have discovered that down on the ground, new technology has given low cost, face-to-face marketing campaigns something of a cutting edge as consumers spread their messages on the Internet.

Take the recent display of public toilets set up by Charmin bathroom tissue: Used by thousands in Times Square and viewed by 7,400 Web users on one site alone. Or Nascar’s recent display of racecars; videos of the event have been viewed on YouTube more than 1,800 times. More than 60 people wrote about the event on their blogs and 60 more spread the word — and pictures — on the Flickr Web site.

“The great thing about the digital world is you can capture these events,” said Christian McMahan, brand director for Smirnoff Ice, owned by Diageo. “People can see them whether they were there that day or 3,000 miles away.”

As a result of the growing popularity of consumer-generated pictures, videos and e-mail messages on Internet sites like YouTube and Myspace, advertisers are getting consumers to essentially do their jobs for them.

When Target, the discount store operator, suspended the magician David Blaine above Times Square for two days during the week of Thanksgiving, videos shot by viewers were posted on YouTube and viewed more than 19,300 times.

“Times Square is becoming, in a way, a publishing platform,” said Peter Stabler, director of communication strategy for Goodby, Silverstein and Partners, an advertising agency that is part of the Omnicom Group. “What happens in Times Square is no longer strictly the province of location. You can experience things that are happening there, even if you’re not there.”

On sites like YouTube, Flickr and MySpace, an army of tourists and residents are spreading advertisers’ messages well beyond Manhattan, using their cell phones and video cameras as they walk through the marketing crossroads of the world.

Consumer brand companies are taking advantage of that by hosting elaborate events, fully aware that those events are great fodder for footage. Hosting events in Times Square, advertisers said, is like buying product placement in a TV show or a movie — except the cameras are held by consumers and the placement is on the Internet.

Experiential marketing, as the ad industry calls such campaigns, is intended to give people something they can tryout and photograph. Companies are holding such events in cities around the world, but advertisers said Times Square was unparalleled in its reach. People around the world recognize Times Square in photos and videos online and are more likely to view them, marketers said.

Charmin’s bathrooms, which opened on Broadway near West 46th Street on Nov. 20, generated traditional coverage with more than 100 articles published about the fancy toilets. But consumer videos posted on YouTube alone have been viewed more than 7,400 times.

Hundreds of other people each week post photos and videos on their blogs and MySpace pages. One blog post last week, “Der New York Trip Part II”, written in German, shows a young couple posing with the Charmin bear. Charmin is a brand of Procter & Gamble.

Another post about the Charmin toilets last week on a Web design blog wondered, “Could this be too much marketing?” Christian Montoya, the site’s author, videotaped the bathrooms when he visited Times Square on Thanksgiving so that he could post the footage online for his roughly 700 daily readers. Though Mr. Montoya, a senior at Cornell University, said he was skeptical of marketing but thought the Charmin bathrooms were effective.

“It was more than a billboard because you could actually try the product,” Mr. Montoya said.

It is difficult to count exactly how many people pass through Times Square each day, but foot traffic by some measures has nearly doubled. In 1997, the Times Square Business Improvement District counted 8,702 people an hour passing through the most crowded parts of Times Square during the busiest times of year. This year, the Times Square Alliance found that nearly double that amount — about 15,000 people — passed the Virgin Megastore on Broadway during busy hours.

But, advocates of experiential marketing say headcounts in Times Square underestimate the district’s impact. Face-to-face interaction with customers is more powerful than traditional ads, they say.

“What people do is geometrically more powerful than what they are told,” said Brian Collins, chief creative officer of Ogilvy and Mather Brand Innovation Group, a part of the WPP Group. “Feeling something, picking it up in your hands, walking into an environment is a far more powerful brand promise than anything you are simply told through traditional media alone.”

On the day after Thanksgiving, Diageo’s Smirnoff Ice brand held a tongue-in-cheek rally featuring about 30 paid actors as “core protestors.” The theme was “save the mistletoe,” a slogan for a holiday campaign for Smirnoff Ice. Smirnoff estimates that 60,000 people passed by its four-hour rally.

“When you go into an arena that is so iconic like Times Square, people are looking to be entertained,” said Christian McMahan, brand director for Smirnoff Ice. “And they’re looking to be part of it.”

In April, General Electric rented nine digital billboards in Times Square and displayed photos of people passing by. People on the street photographed themselves standing below the billboards when their images appeared. Soon, those images were circulating online.

“It’s much more interactive,” said Judy Hu, the global executive director for advertising and branding at G.E. “You’ve got people who are e-mailing, sending messages, they’re involved with your brand personally as opposed to just viewing it.”

G.E. and other companies that hosted recent events would not divulge their costs, but they said the total came out surprisingly low compared with other forms of marketing.

The mayor’s office said permits to use Times Square areas started at $25,000 but often cost $50,000 or more for a day, and that 112 marketers had paid for permits this year.

The amount of marketers in Times Square has soared this year in large part because three traffic islands there were made available on a regular basis this year for the first time as part of Mayor Bloomberg’s broader initiative to attract more tourists to New York City.

In February, Walt Disney World sent Hans Florine, the X-games gold medal climber, scaling up a billboard to promote Expedition Everest, a new Animal Kingdom park ride. Mickey Mouse was also there, but he stayed on the ground.

In early December, MasterCard carolers sang holiday songs and passed out hot chocolate; street vendors sold coffee in Ann Taylor Loft paper cups; and a Sovereign Bank team rode red Segways passing out shopping bags and subway maps.

But some advertising executives wonder if it might be reaching the saturation point.

“It is now getting to the point,” said Lori Robinson, senior vice president of Hill and Knowlton, the WPP Group agency that helped produce one event, “where there just might be a little too much going on in Times Square.”

(NewYorkTimes)

Pour voir un petit audio slide show

07 December 2006

Marketing Strategy shift by Detroit means more branded content




Carmakers Eye All Screens as Way to Put Spotlight on Slew of New Launches

LOS ANGELES -- The major car manufacturers are in the midst of upping their branded-entertainment budgets in an effort to put a spotlight on new or redesigned models they're readying to introduce into the marketplace. Upcoming high-profile placements aren't limited only to movies: TV shows, music, video games and mobile phones -- not to mention YouTube -- stand to gain from Detroit's new marketing focus

(Madison&Vine)

04 December 2006

Service Après Vol, Bonjour

Pour combattre les compagnies low cost qui se sont multipliées ces dernières années, British Airways a choisi d'adopter la méthode agressive.
Grâce à la participation d'Omar et Fred parodiant leur programme Service Après Vente (Canal+), la compagnie britannique dénonce désormais les failles de ses concurrents à bas prix.
Une amusante campagne, prévue de novembre à janvier, conduit vers un site dédié sur lesquels on retrouve une 20aine de sketchs de deux comparses.
L'internaute peut également participer en racontant ses pires mésaventures sur les compagnies low cost...
Et s'il devient "le pigeon voyageur de la semaine", il pourra même peut-être remporter un week-end pour 2 à Londres...

Les marques bousculées par la liberté de ton des internautes

D'un côté des produits et des services de plus en plus indifférenciés. De l'autre des consommateurs de plus en plus critiques. La tâche des publicitaires devient ardue. D'autant que le public n'hésite plus à s'emparer des possibilités décuplées d'Internet pour s'informer, comparer les prix, voire brocarder les marques ou leur communication.

La dixième Semaine de la publicité, qui a eu lieu du 27 au 30 novembre à Paris, avait justement choisi de se pencher sur cette "révolution". Les chiffres sont connus. Dix-neuf millions de Français bénéficient d'un accès Internet à haut débit. Mieux. Près de trois millions de personnes sont producteurs de contenu sur le Web, que ce soit par le biais d'une page personnelle, d'un blog ou en animant un forum.

Cette effervescence autour de ce que l'on nomme l'Internet participatif ou le "Web 2.0" ne peut laisser les marques indifférentes.

L'exemple de Dove est déjà un cas d'école. Cette marque de produit de beauté avait fait parler d'elle en lançant, il y a deux ans, une campagne publicitaire affichant des femmes âgées ou rondes. L'objectif revendiqué : chercher à établir une connivence avec les consommatrices en affirmant que les mannequins n'étaient pas les seules références de beauté. En filigrane, il s'agissait pour Dove, challenger sur ce marché, de trouver un ton en rupture avec le discours de l'entreprise dominante L'Oréal. Cette fois, Dove a décidé de placer sur le site communautaire YouTube un spot où l'on voit la transformation du visage d'une femme, maquillée, coiffée, puis soumise au bistouri miraculeux d'un logiciel de traitement d'image pour devenir un être idéalisé exploité dans une publicité.

Cette vidéo censée dénoncer les trucages publicitaires a fait le tour du monde. Dove s'est félicité de ce succès d'audience obtenu à moindre frais. Sur les forums, toutefois, les critiques ne manquent pas et certains n'hésitent pas à dénoncer la démarche ambiguë de cette entreprise.

Les sites communautaires comme DailyMotion ou YouTube, s'ils permettent d'amplifier un phénomène de bouche à oreille et de démultiplier le discours d'une marque, comme dans le cas de Dove, sont aussi le lieu d'expression libre des internautes. Ceux-ci ne se privent pas de parodier des publicités. En France, les campagnes du fournisseur d'accès à Internet Alice semblent tout particulièrement inspirer les amateurs de détournement. De même, les spots d'Adidas ou de Nike.

Parfois, les internautes choisissent de mettre eux-mêmes en scène les marques. Le cas de Coca-Cola et Mentos est le plus emblématique. Une vidéo montrant l'expérience explosive d'un jet de bonbons dans une bouteille de soda a suscité une vogue mondiale d'apprentis laborantins prêts à filmer leurs exploits. Le phénomène, apparu depuis plus d'un an, continue à susciter des vocations.

Face à ce déferlement mondial, Mentos et Coca-Cola ont réagi différemment. Si le fabricant de confiserie a décidé d'entrer dans le jeu et d'accompagner le mouvement en organisant un concours de "geysers", Coca-Cola a, dans un premier temps, critiqué cette façon de "consommer" son produit avant de tenter de rectifier le tir.

D'un côté des produits et des services de plus en plus indifférenciés. De l'autre des consommateurs de plus en plus critiques. La tâche des publicitaires devient ardue. D'autant que le public n'hésite plus à s'emparer des possibilités décuplées d'Internet pour s'informer, comparer les prix, voire brocarder les marques ou leur communication.

La dixième Semaine de la publicité, qui a eu lieu du 27 au 30 novembre à Paris, avait justement choisi de se pencher sur cette "révolution". Les chiffres sont connus. Dix-neuf millions de Français bénéficient d'un accès Internet à haut débit. Mieux. Près de trois millions de personnes sont producteurs de contenu sur le Web, que ce soit par le biais d'une page personnelle, d'un blog ou en animant un forum.

Cette effervescence autour de ce que l'on nomme l'Internet participatif ou le "Web 2.0" ne peut laisser les marques indifférentes.

Peut-on tirer profit de la créativité et de la participation des internautes ? Les publicitaires et les marques se posent la question. " Nos pires concurrents sont les autres agences mais aussi les internautes", affirme Matthieu de Lesseux, coprésident de l'agence publicitaire Duke. Certaines marques créent des sites de dialogue avec les internautes comme PlayStation, McDonald, la banque HSBC, l'enseigne de bricolage Leroy-Merlin ou la RATP avec sa campagne "objectif respect". D'autres demandent aux internautes de participer à l'élaboration de leur campagne de pub. Brandt l'a fait avec un concours de doudous en ligne. De même, Gillette lance une opération avec TF1 et son site communautaire Wat. Les internautes sont invités à envoyer un spot de 20 secondes pour la marque qui pourra être diffusé sur la chaîne.

Mais gare aux dérapages. Chevrolet, qui voulait s'appuyer sur les internautes pour lancer un nouveau 4 × 4, s'est heurté à l'opposition virulente des écologistes.

Chez Bouygues Télécom, on reconnaît qu'un frein non négligeable existe : la marque de l'opérateur de téléphonie mobile comporte le nom du président de l'entreprise. Pas question de prendre des risques. Bouygues Telecom a donc ouvert un site très contrôlé exclusivement réservé aux fans du service i-mode.

LeMonde.fr

01 December 2006

Ads Migrate to Mobile Handsets

Etat des lieux: c'est sûr, ça vient, mais il faudra être patient; place aux Etudes ... !

After years of resistance, cell phone outfits are working with publishers and partner vendors to try new approaches to selling their space. Mobile advertising is in the early stages of development, and major stakeholders including cellcos, content providers and intermediaries are launching ad-hoc campaigns in a bid to find a way for mobile to fit into the overall advertising landscape.

With its unique advantages of personalization, immediacy and interactivity, the mobile phone has emerged as an attractive advertising tool for brands and advertisers to reach new customers and target audiences. While using mobile as a medium to deliver advertising and marketing messages isn't a new concept, it has been used predominately for SMS-based direct marketing since 2000, and hasn't yet made a significant impact on the world of advertising.

Not until recently, that is. The industry is now seeing mobile advertising generate significant interest among mobile operators, advertisers and ad agencies. Over the past 12 months, after years of resistance, mobile operators are opening their services to advertising, working with publishers and vendor partners to pilot a number of different on-deck approaches - mostly WAP, but other platforms are beginning to emerge in video, downloads and search.

In the US, Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel have launched initiatives to test how consumers react to short video ads on their phones. In Europe, 3 and Orange have begun selling banner ads on their portals to drive users to click on games and video downloads. In Asia, China Mobile and China Unicom recently announced plans to sell advertising space via SMS/MMS, games, IVR and mobile Internet services. Operators like 3 HK and SmarTone-Vodafone are partnering with media agencies and advertisers rolling out mobile advertising campaigns.

Meanwhile, media companies expanding their content to mobile are also keen in tapping the medium as part of their advertising offering to their clients.
Ringo Chan, VP of wireless development at Turner International Asia Pacific, says the company is seeing increased interest in mobile advertising from its clients.
"Every time our advertising sales team at CNN presents a campaign to advertisers, some of them ask: What about mobile?" he says. "Although mobile is now far from a mainstream advertising vehicle, advertisers understand that it's an alternative they could not omit and they have to embrace it."

RICH MEDIA SERVICES

Not surprisingly, the recent buzz over mobile advertising is partly from the fact that mobile services are becoming increasingly content driven.
The increased rollout of 3G and HSDPA, mobile users' growing interest in multimedia content and emerging services like mobile TV and "off-portal" search also open doors to advertisers to exploit the mobile channel for advertising opportunities.
If nothing else, consumers' increased acceptance of mobile advertisements also helps push cellcos and advertisers to explore the business opportunities.
Findings from a recent survey, conducted by Harris Interactive and commissioned by Enpocket, reveal that mobile users are far more accepting of mobile advertising when it is relevant.
The Consumer Mobile Advertising report, conducted with more than 1,200 mobile Internet users across the US, Europe and India, shows that targeted mobile advertising is 50% more acceptable to mobile Internet users than untargeted ads.
Research firm Informa Telecoms & Media predicts that the next 12 months will mark the start of a sharp upturn in mobile advertising spend as the proliferation of cheap, high-quality multimedia handsets and the widespread availability of high-speed mobile networks reaches a critical point.
According to Informa Telecoms & Media, worldwide spend on mobile advertising and marketing will reach over $11.35 billion by 2011, affording consumers cheaper mobile content as advertisers come to terms with the medium.

SPONSORSHIP TO DOMINATE

The question, then, is just what sort of advertising format plays best on mobile?

Early evidence and industry research hint that the content-sponsorship model will be a favorite. Gartner predicts sponsorships are most likely to be the dominant format for mobile advertising until 2010.
For one thing, a sponsorship model is straightforward to sell. Also, a major source of optimism is user acceptance - several consumer surveys found that mobile users in general are willing to receive and view adverts in return for free or lower-cost mobile apps. One survey from Informa Telecoms & Media reveals that music, games and mobile TV/video are the most wanted mobile content services mobile users also want for free.

As such, a number of operators and companies have launched different campaigns to test how consumers react to ad-sponsored content.

A typical example is Greystripe, which distributes mobile games for free to consumers with in-game advertising. Michael Chang, CEO and co-founder of Greystripe, says the company has partnered with 29 mobile game publishers and developers, such as Artificial Life in Hong Kong and Handy Games in Germany, to deliver over 200 game titles to mobile users through its gamejump.com WAP portal.
Chang says Greystripe sells advertising space in its game network for $45 CPM (per thousand impressions) with three different forms of adverts - click-to-call, click-to-mobile web and click-to-jump page (to a survey/poll) - and shares the revenue with game publishers. After downloading the game, end-users must view a full-screen ad before and after they play the game.
Chang says the company currently has seven brands placing adverts on its game portal and claims that the average worldwide click-through rate for its ads with actions in GameJump games achieved a remarkable 15%. Greystripe is also working with mobile application publishers to bring to market ad-supported mobile apps such as instant messaging.

While such a model may offer tier-2 and tier-3 publishers (or other apps that get lost in the deck) alternative revenue resources and channel to market, cellcos are also expected to start to test similar model as a means to supplement their largely consumer transactional model - potentially starting in niche application categories such as news, information and consumer search. Verizon Wireless in the US, for example, is testing a program that will open its phones to advertisng through a two-tier payment model (such as $15 for no ads and less for ad-supported content).

Nicky Walton, senior research analyst with Informa Telecoms & Media, predicts that mobile operators will increasingly adopt ad-funded model in the coming few years, as it will help eliminate high charges that are extensively inhibiting take-up.

"At the moment the cheapest game to download over a mobile operator's portal is around $5, which is very expensive," Walton says. "If operators started offering mobile game downloads for free or a reduced cost, even if it doesn't initially increase usage, it's going to increase the likelihood of people trialing different games, because spending $5 to download something you might not like is lot of money.
The ad-funded model would increase the number of mobile users and draw them to the portals."
Walton says music will be another form of popular content that would attract sponsorships, and by 2008 that focus would shift to mobile TV/video.

BUILDING THE AUDIENCE

While there is little doubt about mobile's potential as a powerful advertising tool, industry players and market watchers agree that it's still very early for mobile advertising, and it will only grow into an established advertising channel after a number of issues have been resolved.

The adoption of mobile advertising is closely tied to the successful of mobile content services such as video, games and music. However, mobile has yet to attract a dedicated advertising budget despite the establishment of a couple of mobile ad networks in the past 12 months, says Gartner analyst Daren Siddall.

Advertisers at this stage, he says, are cautious about allocating budgets to the mobile channel chiefly because there is not yet an audience for advertisers to reach.

"Consumption of mobile content is very small, around the 10% mark, while the penetration of 3G subscribers at most is in the low single digits in most countries. Watching live TV or video, meanwhile, is a relatively new phenomenon and will remain a niche application for some time, which means that the potential reach for advertisers will be too low to attract widespread interest," Siddall says.

Therefore, he notes, the industry at the moment is facing a classic "chicken and egg" situation: advertisers won't commit budget to the mobile channel until they see there is audience to reach. Content providers and mobile operators, which realize that advertising will be an enabler for mobile content, conversely, are worrying whether or not they can generate enough impressions for advertisers and enough revenues to compensate changing their business model from pay-to-use to ad-sponsored.

Ricky Ow, general manager at Sony Pictures Entertainment Networks, who oversees AXN and Animax TV channels in Asia and orchestrates AXN Mobile, agrees that an established audience is vital to lure advertisers. Consequently, Sony Pictures' priority for now is getting viewers and the AXN brand out there in the mobile market.
"With viewers there will be proof of evidence of data which we can sell more intelligently to advertisers," Ow says, adding that AXN is currently is working with a few handset makers for ad sponsorship on mobile, but it's too early to offer details.

MEASUREMENT AND METRICS

Mobile advertising's nascent status also means that the delivery format is still in development, as is any standard to guide that development.
Another issue is that there is little in the way of transparency or metrics available to measure the effectiveness of mobile adverts. There isn't even any agreement as to what those metrics should be.
Measurement technique used in online advertising - such as click-through rates, impressions, cost-per-sale and cost-per-thousands - can be applied in the mobile environment, but they can't provide concrete details like whether the mobile user is clicking through on the Internet via the mobile phone.

For the mobile advertising market to move from test and niche levels to becoming part of the mainstream buying process, analysts say the industry must provide more visibility into the medium, including the establishment of reliable measurement and metrics for advertisers to measure the effectiveness of mobile adverts.

Ow of Sony Pictures agrees: "I think those questions have to be answered first before we see the influx of advertising on the mobile channel. This is not just for us, this is for everybody."
But such issues are not expected to be resolved soon, as a value chain for mobile advertising has yet to be established, Gartner's Siddall says.

"The advertising value chain is highly fragmented, involving advertisers, ad agencies, media agencies, media content owners and others in the delivery of ads to consumers," he says. "Throwing mobile into the mix adds even more complexity, with the addition of network operators, mobile marketing specialists, messaging or WAP gateway providers, and perhaps mobile application developers."

He adds that, given the lack of a single voice evangelizing the medium, migration of spend to the mobile channel is expected to be slow over the next five years.

That said, in the next year or two we'll be seeing a lot of experiments carried out by each stakeholder in the industry as they try to form standards and some level of understanding of what will work on mobile and the kind of format consumers will find acceptable.

"It's really about finding its way and its role in this overall advertising landscape," he says. "And that at the moment is not certain."

BusinessWeekOnline (Provided by Telecom Asia—Copyright: © 2006 Questex Media Group, Inc.)

29 November 2006

Old-School Sponsorship From a Digital-Era Company

Match.com will sponsor the new TBS program “My Boys,” whose young characters are searching for love in Chicago.

MATCHMAKER, matchmaker, make me a match. So sang the daughters of Tevye in “Fiddler on the Roof.” For a TV comedy series that begins tonight — about a young woman’s dating life, appropriately enough — Madison Avenue is playing matchmaker, bringing together an advertiser and a network for an elaborate sponsorship deal.

The matchmaker is MediaHub from Mullen, the media planning and buying division of Mullen, an agency owned by the Interpublic Group of Companies. MediaHub is hooking up Match.com, the dating Web site operated by IAC/InterActiveCorp, with the TBS cable network for a season-long sponsorship of the new sitcom, called “My Boys.”

Under the agreement, estimated at $1 million to $2 million, Match.com will be featured in all 13 episodes of “My Boys,” which chronicles the adventures of a twentysomething who covers sports for a Chicago newspaper as she juggles her career and social life. The Web site will be featured prominently in two episodes and play cameo roles in the rest.

Other elements of the deal include identification of “My Boys” as “sponsored by Match.com” in a television, print, radio and online promotional campaign that TBS is creating for the series; the posting of a profile of a character from the series on Match.com; billboard-style ads for Match.com on a special “My Boys” Web site (tbs.com/shows/myboys/); and a discussion of “My Boys” and Match.com during an episode of another TBS show, “Movie and a Makeover.”

The sponsorship is another example of an advertising technique that is being revived, decades after fading from the media landscape. Known as branded entertainment, it recalls the days when announcers intoned at the start of TV and radio shows that they were being “brought to you by” some name-brand consumer product.

Branded entertainment is returning to television because of its ability to interweave product pitches into the story lines of the shows that consumers want to watch. The goal is to counter viewers’ increasing ability to ignore or avoid more interruptive advertising like traditional commercials.

Among other advertisers that are taking part in the revival of branded entertainment are Coca-Cola, General Motors, Philips Electronics North America, Procter & Gamble and Unilever.

(...)
Branded entertainment projects “are easier when it’s an organic fit,” Ms. Yaccarino said. “Otherwise you’re just going to turn off the viewer, and then all of your work was for naught.
“As long as we respect the creative process, and that takes the lead, that’ll keep the viewers watching.”
The deal is “the biggest co-branded effort that Turner has ever done,” Ms. Yaccarino said, “and I think you’ll definitely see more of this.”
(...)

NewYorkTimes (pour l'article complet)

You Oughta Be In Webcasts

Scripted Web shows are piquing the interest of Mad Ave and giving filmmakers a new venue

Scene six, take two. Action. "I love the skulls on your shirt," says a snooty designer. "It's very Pol Pot chic." On a recent Saturday in Brooklyn, the 11th episode of Web sitcom The Burg is being filmed in the Bushwick Country Club bar. A satire about the hipsters of the Williamsburg neighborhood, the show in five months has developed a small but hard-core group of fans, many of them the same arty twentysomethings the show skewers. Cast and crew may be working for free, but they aren't rookies. One is All My Children actress Kelli Giddish, and this shoot has all the trappings of a professional production.

Welcome to the new wave of Web video. Far from the land of dogs on skateboards and Webcam yakkers on YouTube , this online genre of scripted programs is attracting small but passionate groups of fans. The networks and talent agencies are watching closely, and the phenomenon is giving indie filmmakers new ways to get their works seen. At the same time, this emerging ecosystem is creating a tempting--albeit challenging--play for advertisers looking to cut through the chaotic mass of Web pages on YouTube and MySpace. "These scripted, episodic shows are great," says Eric Bader, senior vice-president of digital connections at media buyer MediaVest USA. "They create a defined idea in the minds of the viewer, and brands can get a halo effect."

One site, Channel101.com, just signed a deal with VH1. The site invites Los Angeles comedy pros to shoot five-minute sitcom "pilots," which viewers vote on. Producers of the top five then compete against new entrants to retain "prime time" slots on the site. VH1 will use Channel101 contributors to start a similar show called the Department of Acceptable Media that will air on TV and online. "The attraction was that the Web site may be as popular or more so than the show itself," says Brian Graden, president of entertainment at MTV Networks

Filmmakers see Web video as a way to circumvent the system. After failing to get a distribution deal for Four Eyed Monsters, a film about two angst-ridden kids in New York, Arin Crumley and Susan Buice began a video podcast that was, in effect, a serialized documentary, charting the frustrations of making the movie, finding a distributor, and sustaining their four-year relationship. The podcasts generated a following. That prompted the filmmakers to offer a deal to fans: Get enough people to request our movie in your area, and we'll show up, do a screening, and throw an after party. So far the film has appeared in six cities. The podcasts helped create a niche audience.

LOCAL HEROES
Given these webcasts' ability to generate dedicated followers, their potential seems particularly attractive to advertisers. The Burg, for instance, already has viewers paying close attention to the bars the characters hang out in and to the songs on the show's sound track, which are produced entirely by local Brooklyn bands. Advertisers, including Dewar's, have approached the show's creator, Kathleen Grace, about running video ads ahead of the episodes. The rates are competitive with those of rich media ads offered on other sites, she says, but since they're based on the hits a site gets and her audience is only about 10,000 per episode, any ad revenue generated won't even cover her bandwidth costs, let alone pay the cast and crew. (The show is currently self-financed.)

One possible player: Veoh Networks Inc., which launches officially in December. Unlike YouTube, which limits the length and quality of video, Veoh will allow creators to upload videos of any length and resolution quality, including high-definition. Even better, Veoh will let those who upload decide on their own compensation model, whether it be via ads or on a pay-per-download basis.

(BusinessWeekOnline)

28 November 2006

British Junk-Food Ad Ban Rocks TV Business : les anglais tirent les 1ers

Marketers and media owners are counting the cost following U.K. regulator Ofcom's surprise decision to end junk-food advertising to all children under 16.
(...)
Ofcom's ruling includes a total ban on advertising foods high in fat, salt and sugar (referred to as HFSS), not only around children's programming but also in youth-oriented and adult programs which attract a lot of viewers under 16. Many of the marketers involved have voluntarily stopped targeting young children in recent years, and moved their campaigns onto youth channels such as MTV, believing they were safe in targeting teenagers.
(...)
The U.K. rules are clearer and may be easier to implement than restrictions the French are still wrangling over. Food marketers in France were supposed to either add a health message to ads for any manufactured food or beverage except water, or pay a tax equal to 1.5% of their annual ad budget toward campaigns for more-healthful eating. The French law was supposed to go into effect this year, but its provisions are still unclear.

AdAge (article complet)

P&G Reigns Supreme at China's Wild TV Upfront

Procter & Gamble's associate director-media, Greater China, assumes his throne for 10 hours at one of the world's strangest and most colorful media events, the China Central Television auction. There, with great grandeur, in one grueling day that generates 60% of its advertising income, China's national broadcaster sells slots for prime-time programming and special packages for the coming year -- and the promise of the Beijing Olympics helped it reap $862 million, up 16%.

The auction starts at 8:18 a.m. because "8" is considered the luckiest number in China.

(...) Radically different from U.S. The CCTV auction system is radically different from the way advertisers buy airtime on media in other countries, said Jack Klues, chairman of Publicis Groupe's media division, as he witnessed his first CCTV auction. In the U.S., "there are several TV networks that are more or less equally strong, so advertisers pit sellers against each other. But in China, CCTV has the power, so the system pits advertisers against each other."
(...)
'Giving face' Media experts say the auction is really about ceremony, "giving face" to partners and making CCTV look good. Besides linking their brands to the Olympics, Chinese companies buy slots at the auction "to make a big show, to further government relations or to gain credibility and stature before an IPO," said Rob Hughes, managing director, MindShare, Beijing. While P&G is the king of the auction, the real winner is always CCTV.

AdAgeChina (Article complet)

27 November 2006

Fine art ads photoshopping contest

Today on the Worth1000 photoshopping contest - fine art reimagined as contemporary advertising.
Déjà vu évidemment, mais quelques belles réalisations !
(BoingBoing)






Nokia. Connecting people since the beginning






Impossible Liberation